You start Visual Studio, you add components to a form, you start writing code. The big problem with C# is that it is not free and that it is not yet much use for cross-platform programming (Mono notwithstanding). As another poster said, I like both for different reasons. The article is hosted by developerworks which is hosted by IBM.Īnd for the record, I use both Eclipse and Netbeans. The author has written another article on Eclipse. I won’t continue to pick apart the article but I’ll close with this… the resources at the bottom of the page are all for Eclipse save one… a link to the netbeans site. All commands are available in multiple contexts and it’s about as transparent as can be. In fact, it offers two built in clients (all java cvs or vcsgeneric CVS). Netbeans has had strong support for CVS for a loooong time. If people want to migrate, they are most concerned with losing features or not knowing how to do the equivalent.Īt the end it says that Netbeans doesn’t have strong support for CVS… whoa… obviously he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Here’s how you would do the same in Eclipse. Where’s the direct comparison between the two IDE’s? Like, here’s how X is done in Netbeans. It’s not followed with why people prefer Netbeans! In fact, I’d even argue that you could take the same paragraph and replace “Eclipse” with “Netbeans” and it would be just as meaningful. Because these attributes are hard to quantify, though, you really need to try it out and judge for yourself whether Eclipse makes Java programming faster and easier for you.” Many programmers also find Eclipse faster and more stable. “Many programmers prefer Eclipse because of its ease of use the overall design of Eclipse keep the tools you need immediately at your fingertips. 100% of the examples and screenshots are from Eclipse. Hmmm… which is it? Well it turned out to be an ad for Eclipse, not an evaluation guide. “A Developers Guide to Evaluating Eclipse vs. If only IDEA could write out IBM’s deployment descriptors, I could get rid of Studio as well □ But, alas, that is not likely to happen, as, who would ever want to write out those ugly “xml” files. So, Netbeans did not last long on my machine. I have played around with NetBeans in the past, but, I’m lucky enough to have had my company purchase IntelliJ IDEA for me, and now, I am spoiled. Personally, I find they get in the way at times, as certain functionality is only available through certain perspectives, and, at times, it takes a long time to switch between different perspectives (maybe only a studio issue due to so many plugins). Some people like the “perspectives” of Eclipse. However, I have installed Eclipse 3 on my Mac, and, though it is nice, without the ability to do J2EE work out of the box, it is completely unusable to me. Please note, however, that all of my views on eclipse are based through Studio, which, is Eclipse 2 + 100 plugins. I was just surprised by that comment, as I find myself yelling at Studio daily □ But, like you said, this is a free version comparison. The only “nice” part is the “integration” of WAS, but even that is not perfect, as it does not fully act and is not set up like a stand-alone installation. The plugin-editors (struts, ejb, etc) flake out at times, preventing a save. You like Studio? Wow, for me I think it is very slow (even under a dual-opteron) and prone to crash. When coupled with difficult Java, it makes C# and Visual Studio look like money very well spent. No longer is it necessary just to learn a new programming language, you have to take a course in how to use the IDE as well. Together they seem designed to make it impossible to use. This seems bad until you start to think of Eclipse.Įclipse is free and comes freely equipped with things called paradigms, perspectives and workbenches. Netbeans automatically generates code that you are not allowed to edit, even if you need to. It is not clear how to change this behavior. Test a form and it opens 0 pixels wide by 0 pixels high. Netbeans is free and behaves pretty much as an IDE should, although working with Forms is not as easy as it should be. Borland’s JBuilder is quite popular, but is not the subject of this article. The big problem with Java, apart from its verbosity, is its IDE’s.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |